Diaspora group warns Election Tribunal against subverting justice, tells Ecowas to avoid military action in Niger
6 min read
Diaspora Action for Democracy in Africa---DADA officials during press conference in Abuja
Diaspora Action for Democracy in Africa—DADA, a group which facilitate, promote, and support the advancement of democracy and good governance on the African continent, has called on the Election Petition Tribunal in Nigeria not to subvert justice as Nigerians anxiously wait for it’s final judgement in a case filed by the presidential candidate of the Labour Party–LP, Mr Peter Obi and his PDP counterpart, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar challenging the victory of President Bola Tinubu in the last election.
While addressing a press conference in Abuja on Thursday, DADA, called on five member Panel of the Election Petition Tribunal headed by Justice Haruna Tsammani to be cautious because if their verdict fails to satisfy the requirements of justice, it may detonate the youth’s simmering anger and set the country fire.
DADA reaffirmed the fact that “All eyes are currently on the judiciary which it said is the only institution that has all that it takes to save Nigeria from the threat of possible implosion.
It said, “Nigeria’s 2023 election has moved from the ballot box to the courtroom. The results from Nigeria’s general elections were under scrutiny in May 2023 as courts considered several petitions.
“Following the vote, which took place in February and March, about 327 petitions had been filed with election tribunals across the country.
“President Bola Tinubu’s victory was one of those under the microscope, as rivals challenged his election. This is as the country’s Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) insisted it had done its job as referee well, pushing back on allegations of irregularities.
“Be that as it may, the tribunal concluded sittings on 1st August and Nigerians now await decisions from the honourable judges presiding over the Presidential Election Tribunal in Nigeria: Hon. Justice Haruna Tsammani, Hon. Justice Stephen Jonah Ada, Hon. Justice Mistura Omodere Bolaji-Yusuf, Hon. Justice Boloukuoromo Moses Ugo, and Hon. Justice Abba Bello Mohammed.
“We believe strongly and the judges know, that, in the history of Nigeria, no other election tribunal has raised the consciousness of Nigerians more than the 2023 presidential election which they are currently presiding over. As far as Nigeria and the 2023 presidential election tribunal are concerned, the mantra, All Eyes on The Judiciary, which has assumed the position of Nigeria’s fearless twitterati should tell judges that it is no longer business as usual.
“Arising from our discussions with a wide array of Nigerians is the fear that the judiciary needs to be cautious because if their verdict fails to satisfy the requirements of justice it may detonate the youth’s simmering anger and set the country ablaze.
“We agree with Rev. Fr. John Odey who wrote: ‘The lessons we can learn from the #EndSars Protests, and the 2023 elections is this: When the people are pinned against the wall of despair, when they are unjustifiably compelled to be poor, miserable and hopeless, when they are systematically denied of all sources of decent living, when they cannot trust their leaders, when they have justifiable reasons to be angry, when they cannot trust the police as the guardians of law and order, when the law that should be their last hope turns round to become their worst enemy with the result that they cannot trust the justice system, and finally when the nation itself ignores the justifiable rage of the neglected younger generation as it happened during the End-SARS protest of October 2020 and during the electoral savagery of the 2023 elections, there is the threat of some violent explosion unless the situation is redressed.’
“The Judiciary is the only institution that has all that it takes to save this country from the threat of implosion. All eyes have been on the judiciary because of Nigeria’s respect for the law. It does not mean that the members of the Presidential Election Tribunal are in a better position in this case to tell Nigerians the person who won the presidential election. Nigerians do not wait for any court to tell them the winner of any election. It is the electorate that should tell the court so because they know more than the court whom they voted to be their president. But since it is the prerogative of the court to ensure that truth and justice prevail each time they are disputed, to make room for peace and harmony, the court has been given enough evidence to prove the real winner of the 2023 presidential election.
“We deplore the threat by a candidate in the elections against the judiciary that if he is removed for not measuring up to the demands of the electoral laws of the land there will be chaos and anarchy in the country. Under normal circumstances that should be an empty threat because he is not bigger than Nigeria. Rather, what is likely to cause chaos and anarchy will be any attempt to pervert the justice that is so glaring.
“In all, it is submitted that the outlook for the Judiciary in 2023 is a tricky one. To be sure, there have been moments in Nigeria’s history when the Judiciary distinguished itself as a bastion of our democracy and cherished rule of law principles. Opinions are however, bound to be divided, as to whether the recent outlook of that institution inspires similar hope at this time. Whatever side of the divide one might identify with, what is however, clear, is that we might have just come to one of such critical junctures in our history again, and the enormous role of the Judiciary in shaping it, should not be lost on it.”
Speaking on the current political face-off in Niger Republic, DADA noted that regardless of the positions taken by various parties that have direct or tangential interests in Niger, primacy should be given to dialogue and diplomacy in resolving the crisis.
The diaspora group however, said that while the regional bloc—ECOWAS must seek to discourage the spread of military dictatorships in region, the recourse to armed deterrence must be restrained by multilateral diplomatic mechanisms.
“Recent developments in neighbouring Niger Republic have become the subject of international attention. For Nigeria, this development is a matter of dire and urgent national interest and security.
“Inevitably, Niger is a hot button issue for ECOWAS, as well as various international interlocutors.
“Regional leaders ended their second emergency summit on Niger in Abuja on Thursday 10th August, by “ordering the deployment of the ECOWAS Standby Force to restore constitutional order in Niger,” where the military deposed elected President Mohamed Bazoum in a coup on 26th of July.
“Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, who is Chair of the Authority had in his opening address, said that no option was off the table, including the use of force to restore constitutional order in Niger.
“Algeria, another key Niger neighbour, along with three ECOWAS suspended member States ruled by the military – Mali, Guinea, and Burkina Faso – have kicked against any military intervention in Niger.
“Mali and Burkina Faso military regimes have warned that military action by ECOWAS would be considered a declaration of war against their countries and could lead to their withdrawal from ECOWAS and their joint measures to defend the armed forces and people of Niger.
“Given such a delicate scenario, ECOWAS’ threat to deploy its Standby force to Niger also runs against independent dissenting opinions.
“Defence experts have expressed reservations about the appropriateness of such as a high-risk option as well as the practicality of the military deployment, given that the regional Standby Force has been facing financial and operationalisation challenges.
“In the words of Paul Ejime, an ECOWAS and AU Conflict Resolution Consultant, “Apart from the possibility of a military confrontation escalating into a catastrophic war, and the consequences of military intervention in the complex environment can be better imagined than experienced.”
“Therefore, regardless of the positions taken by various parties that have direct or tangential interests in Niger, primacy must be given to dialogue and diplomacy towards a resolution with minimal disruptive impact on Nigeria and the West African sub region.
“Whereas ECOWAS authorities have indicated that they remain open to various conflict resolution options, diplomacy should remain the overarching imperative in resolving the present crisis.
“We join the many well-meaning Nigerians who have advocated that any intervention in the crisis, should be pre-eminently through diplomatic dialogue among all strategic interests in the crisis.
“The people of Niger are allowed via their national institutions, the opportunity to revert quickly to a representative democratic government.
“While ECOWAS must seek to discourage the spread of military dictatorships in West Africa, the recourse to armed deterrence must be restrained by multilateral diplomatic mechanisms.”
Source: NewsBand
